Lessons in appropriate use: Issues are rare, but scrutiny is healthy

01/7/2013 | MedPage Today (free registration)

Although news reports of alleged inappropriate stent implantation grabbed headlines over the past year, a registry review did not find widespread issues. Maryland has emerged from the shadow of two prominent cases with a new law setting strict standards for hospital oversight. Strategies such as random case reviews can be important in addressing problems before they become serious, said Dr. Ajay Kirtane of Columbia University Medical Center and Dr. Ken Rosenfield of Massachusetts General Hospital. "With consistent, transparent peer review, cath labs can identify those interventionalists who haven't necessarily breached ethical boundaries, but who could benefit from education about new techniques or practice style changes," Kirtane said.

View Full Article in:

MedPage Today (free registration)

Published in Brief:

SmartBrief Job Listings for Health Care

Job Title Company Location
Counsel – Regulatory Affairs
RAI Services Company
Winston Salem, NC
Director of Program Development
AdvaMed
Washington DC, DC
Director of System QA
LifeWatch Services, Inc.
Rosemont, IL
Director of Business Development and Membership
AdvaMed
Washington DC, DC
Director, Corporate Counsel
Regeneron
Tarrytown, NY