Study finds gender bias in perceptions of scientific research

04/22/2013 | HealthDay News

Graduate students in communications who were asked to read research abstracts from a variety of disciplines were more likely to rate abstracts "important," "innovative" and of high quality if the authors were two males instead of two females, researchers report in the journal Science Communication. Abstracts in male-dominated disciplines such as political communication, computer science and journalism, were rated more highly when listed authors were male. "There's still a stereotype in our society that science is a more appropriate career for men than it is for women," lead author Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick said.

View Full Article in:

HealthDay News

Published in Brief:

SmartBrief Job Listings for Health Care

Job Title Company Location
Vice President - Government Products
Health Alliance Plan
Detroit, MI
Consumer Directed Health Plan (CDH) Product Offering Manager
Blue Cross Blue Shield MA
Quincy, MA
Actuary
Meridian Health Plan
Detroit, MI
ISHN - Chief Compliance Officer
Mountain States Health Alliance
Johnson City, TN
President/Chief Executive Officer
MedCost
Winston-Salem, NC