Study finds gender bias in perceptions of scientific research

04/22/2013 | HealthDay News

Graduate students in communications who were asked to read research abstracts from a variety of disciplines were more likely to rate abstracts "important," "innovative" and of high quality if the authors were two males instead of two females, researchers report in the journal Science Communication. Abstracts in male-dominated disciplines such as political communication, computer science and journalism, were rated more highly when listed authors were male. "There's still a stereotype in our society that science is a more appropriate career for men than it is for women," lead author Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick said.

View Full Article in:

HealthDay News

Published in Brief:

SmartBrief Job Listings for Health Care

Job Title Company Location
Chief Executive Officer
Center for Improving Value in Healthcare
Denver, CO
Quality Program Manager II, State Programs
Tufts Health Plan
Watertown, MA
Associate Director, Promotion Integrity
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Plainsboro, NJ
Vice President, Medicare Advantage
BCBS-Louisiana
Baton Rouge, LA
Director, Global Integrity and Compliance, Pharmaceuticals
Alcon
Fort Worth, TX