Court rules on bone marrow donor compensation

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said bone marrow donated through peripheral blood stem cell apheresis can be compensated because the procedure is akin to blood donation and not organ transplantation. The court, however, said bone marrow donated through a procedure called aspiration, which involves extracting bone marrow from a donor's bones, is still covered by the National Organ Transplant Act, which bans payments for bone marrow donations. The Justice Department is considering whether to recommend the ruling to the Supreme Court or ask the appeals court to reconsider the decision.

View Full Article in:

Google · New York Times (tiered subscription model), The

Published in Briefs:

SmartBrief Job Listings for Health Care

Job Title Company Location
Corporate Counsel - Healthcare Law Group
South San Francisco, CA
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Office of the Chief Counsel
Silver Spring, MD, MD
Counsel – Regulatory Affairs
RAI Services Company
Winston Salem, NC
Senior Manager, Clinical Affairs - Advanced Technology
Edwards Lifesciences
Irvine, CA
Director, Litigation & Investigations EMEA
Gilead Sciences
Stockely Park